Spaceship Voyager

Spaceship title

This article began as a paid review of the Spaceship Voyager app-based investing platform, but then Spaceship didn’t approve it for publication, so I gave up on the original article. Here’s the story of that review, along with relevant excerpts from it, intended as a guide for anyone considering investing in it.

Spaceship logo vertical

If the name Spaceship rings a bell, it might be because of the controversy surrounding their superannuation fund, which got fined for false advertising recently. Voyager is separate from the super fund, and it provides two simple investment options: the Index portfolio and the Universe portfolio, which are essentially passive and actively managed funds, respectively.

The two portfolios are simple enough. Both portfolios track indexes built and maintained in-house by Spaceship. The Index fund includes the 100 largest Australian companies, and the 100 largest international companies, measured by market capitalisation. The Universe portfolio’s index includes 100 companies actively chosen by Spaceship’s investment managers.


Star TrekImmediately after I published my article about Vanguard’s ownership structure back in July, Spaceship tried to post a comment spruiking their Voyager app in reply to my article. I blocked the comment, because I didn’t want spam on my site. They tried again a couple of hours later, and I blocked it again, so it never appeared publicly. Then they sent me an email offering me $250 to write an independent review. I was sceptical, but I went back to them to confirm that “independent” meant that I was free to write my honest opinion. They confirmed that I was free to write whatever I wanted, warts and all. So I dived into their PDS and the iPhone app and spent a few weeks researching Voyager inside and out. I liked some things about it, and also had a few concerns, all of which I wrote into my review. Then I sent it off to Spaceship for vetting. I was told that they’d OK it within 2 weeks.

tumbleweedThen, silence… I assumed that they didn’t like the negative aspects I had described in my review, but I kept following it up every couple of weeks. Two months later, I still hadn’t heard anything, nor received any payment. So I sent them a final follow up saying that I had decided to withdraw my review, and that I would instead write a review of their review submission process, free of charge! That got an immediate reaction. Within 24 hours a couple of different Spaceship staff contacted me with apologies. They blamed the lack of payment on an accounting error, and they once again promised to arrange the payment, despite me telling them not to bother since I had decided not to go ahead with the review. But they insisted, saying that I deserved to be paid the agreed sum regardless of whether the “advertorial” got approved, and anyway they already had my bank details so I couldn’t really refuse the payment. Note that the word “advertorial” was nowhere in the original brief. So, full disclosure: it’s possible that at some point I will receive $250 from Spaceship in payment for an article I wrote about three months ago, which isn’t this article. At the time of publishing this, I have not received any payment.

None of the above inspires confidence in Spaceship, and I really can’t recommend their product. Accounting system errors are a red-card for any investing platform. But, that doesn’t change the fact that there are some things which I really like about Voyager. So, in the spirit of even handedness and honest review, here are some excerpts from the original article:


Tintin rocketThe best thing about Spaceship Voyager is the cost: it’s ridiculously cheap. If you have less than $5000 invested in it, there are no fees. Zilch, nada, mei-you. No transaction or brokerage fees, no buy-sell spreads, and no management expenses. For balances above $5000, the fees are still extremely low. The passive Index portfolio has a management expense fee of 0.05% per annum, and the active Universe portfolio costs 0.1%. These fees only apply to the part of your balance which goes above $5K, so your first $5K is always free. Try and find a comparable investment product on the Australian market with lower fees than that, I dare you. (And if you do find one, please leave a comment below!)

App A2Voyager’s interface is nice and simple to use. It’s entirely app based, so you do everything from your phone. It’s a streamlined experience, without a lot of the complexity that seasoned investors are used to putting up with. Of course, many will also see that as a negative, but Spaceship’s target audience will find it easy to get into. And if you’re a finance nerd like me, you’re probably already getting your fill of detailed data from your favourite online news, chat, and blogging sites. The user interface has an elegant, visually appealing layout, which also helps to take some of the fear out of investing. Importantly, Spaceship’s support team are responsive and helpful. I shot them a few questions before deciding whether to invest with them, and I got timely, comprehensive answers.

Of course, it’s not all roses. Apart from my negative experiences with their marketing department, I also have some reservations about their investment product, which I included in the article I wrote.


Star Wars shipsVoyager is having some teething troubles, symptoms of Spaceship being the new kid on the block. For example, there’s no way to see the fund’s past performance. The fund only began in April this year, so there isn’t much history anyway, but when I asked the Spaceship support team for more data they told me that regulatory compliance prevents them from publishing even the short performance history that they have. Of course, this will be solved sooner or later, once it has sufficient history under its belt.

Also irritating is the fact that the only way to invest in Voyager is by setting up a direct debit to automatically take money out of your bank account. You can’t directly transfer money from your bank account. But again, this is fairly minor, and again, they said they’re working on it.

Rocket comicTheir marketing department seems to be out of touch with their millenial target audience. They’ve been accused of astro-turfing on Reddit and carpet-spamming in other online forums (such as in comments on people’s blogs!).

Their Product Disclosure Statements are annoyingly vague. They seem to have tried to make them accessible to casual readers, rather than making them exact and unambiguous. Personally, I prefer a good, clear PDS that spells out the terms and conditions without any uncertainty. Just as an example of this, it was difficult for me to figure out how the Index portfolio ‘chooses’ (passively) the 100 foreign companies it holds. In the product description, it just says that they are large international companies. I had to ask them directly to clarify that it’s the 100 largest international companies.


Georges Melies (edited)Another worrying clause of the PDS states that Spaceship can suspend redemptions at their discretion during periods of market volatility. That means that when you decide to pull your money out, they might prevent you from doing that. Just temporarily, of course. But in the event of significant market volatility, or the onset of a crash, being temporarily unable to retrieve your investments could leave you without much investment left by the time the suspension is lifted. I can see why having that ability makes sense, but I want the freedom to act on whatever hunch or instinct I might have. Removing that freedom could lead to a race to withdraw funds, potentially amplifying the volatility.

Terminus EstThe biggest issue is about trust. I find it hard to believe that the rock bottom fee structure will last forever. I can’t see how they can make a profit if most of their investors pay zero or close to zero towards their management expenses. I asked them this question directly, and they gave me a sideways answer about being funded by venture capital. Without something more concrete, I have to assume that the prices will rise as soon as they get enough customers. When that happens, investors will be forced to decide between getting gouged on fees or paying the taxman a premature capital gains bill for withdrawing from the Voyager.

Having trust in your investment vehicles is absolutely essential. It’s the only thing that’ll keep your hand steady in the next market crash. I don’t mean trusting that the investment will perform well, because I’m not naive enough to believe that a history of good past performance can ensure future performance. I mean that I want to see signs of good judgment on the part of the whole company. That would give me more confidence in Spaceship being able to weather adverse market conditions or other spanners that could get thrown into the works, such as the vagaries of regulation and compliance. More confidence in their decision making would also help me to trust that their current ultra cheap fee structure will continue indefinitely, rather than potentially being a loss leading plan to grab market share.


So that’s that. If you’re looking for the cheapest investment option, look no further. But, as always, caveat emptor. Buyer beware. Whether or not you choose to trust Spaceship with your hard earned is up to you. This is something that no amount of doing your own research will provide, so you’ll have to go with your gut instinct.

I actually tried to make a tiny investment into their Index portfolio, just $100 for research purposes. However, the transaction didn’t go through for some reason. I didn’t get any notification in the app or any email telling me that it had failed, but I watched my bank balance, and nothing came out. After a few days I contacted them to find out whether I had been issued any units. They told me that there had been another accounting error and the transaction had failed, and they suggested that I try again. I did not try again.


  1. Hmmm, I think I’ll leave that one alone.
    I have a little bit in RAIZ, but do not like that it is a direct debit structure either. Much happier with the small amount I have in Stockspot and the very clear info on their site – although I do not use it for serious investment purposes and I thinks their fees could be a little more competitive.


    1. I haven’t tried Raiz / Acorns. I don’t really see the point, to be honest. I just keep my cash in the bank until it builds up to $5K, then buy an ETF or LIC. If I didn’t have to pay for the pleasure, then I’d consider it, which is obviously what I liked best about Voyager.


      1. A few months. But it doesn’t matter how long it takes, it’s just about the process for me. I’d rather have the accumulating cash earning interest with zero fees while it’s waiting to be deployed into the market.


  2. It sounds very much like they’ve tried to rush a product to market without getting a lot of the basic stuff right. It seems weird that they’ll only take money on an automated basis with a direct debit rather than allowing you to transfer money in (or potentially out) whenever you want to.

    When it comes to money I want to make sure that everything works properly and that the company is pretty solid and will likely be around for a long time. This doesn’t sound remotely like that and even if it suited my investment strategy I’d be giving it a big miss, especially given there are a reasonable number of other similar products.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi. I just read this article after seeing the company on my newsfeed and this was very detailed and helpful. How do you think the company has performed since you’ve published this article up until now?


  3. I am supprised by their pricing. I think the biggest issue for me is Trust in the company. Will fees still be cheap in next 30 years? Will the company even exist then? Simple vanguard etfs or LICs will do for me.


  4. Another shortcoming is Spaceship currently only allows investments in personal names. You can’t invest in other entities. Spaceship said it’s addressing this and it’ll be available soon. However that was in July and it’s still not available now.


  5. Hi. Just bumped into your article while google searching Spaceship. Agree with all the points above. The ability of the company to survive seems questionable with sub low fees and high overheads. They have a huge marketing department and IT staff but very few investment professionals.

    I’ve got no issue with suspension during market volatility times. Standard language these days.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Hi. Just bumped into your article while google searching Spaceship. Agree with all the points above. The ability of the company to survive seems questionable with sub low fees and high overheads. They have a huge marketing department and IT staff but very few investment professionals.


  7. I’ve been using spaceship for a year.
    I got to say it’s not bad.
    I’m getting returns of over 19% of the original money I deposited.
    I’d like you to review it again as I think it’s come along way in a shirt time


    1. I’m not inclined to, unless something has changed that I don’t know about. The reason I was unwilling to try it before had nothing to do with returns, it was all about trust. And I just don’t see any reason to change that assessment.

      I would need to see evidence that their business model is sustainable and profitable just for starters…


  8. This was a really helpful review thank you 🙂 I have had some money in there for a month as a test and it’s done well, but I think I’ll be removing it before the end of the tax year and directly investing it in an ETF. It really does give me an uncomfortable “too good to last” feeling and your points made me realise why. The costing just doesn’t make sense.


  9. Seems like they are gaining money from dividends from companies they invest in. Part of their PDS states that dividends will only be paid out at the ” fund managers discretion”. So basically you gain or lose at the rise or fall of stock prices. And they gain by the dividends. If they back a dividend paying company they win. Low fees is what attracted me, time will tell….


  10. None of these investment groups should be charging any fees what so ever, do you really think that the money they earn from all the small investors is equally divided up and sent back to you? Of course they are keeping a large volume of the earnings for themselves and then to charge you a fee is just icing on the cake for them.


    1. That’s easy, here’s my (only half tongue in cheek) review of Raiz/Acorns: “Same product, higher fees. What’s the point?”

      Seriously though, the basic concept of these mini-investing apps is very similar. So if you’re buying a commodity, why would you pay more than the absolute minimum? I don’t care about a flashy interface, and I don’t believe in so-called smart investing strategies, so I just want the cheapest way to invest in the index (or something very like the index).

      I haven’t looked in detail at either Raiz or Spaceship in over a year, so I don’t really know if they’ve changed their fee structures recently. Please correct me if I’m wrong!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s